🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a law raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid first step," said a leading parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and fit for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this worldwide debate continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.